2016年6月GMAT逻辑机经:老房子和新房子

　　V1

一个镇子上的老房子的质量都比新建的房子的质量好，维修次数少，依然坚挺神马的。于是镇上的老人家认为，现在的房子粗制滥造偷工减料。

以下哪个选项weaken了老人的结论?

Lz选 当年质量不好的老房子现在都塌了 所以你没看到

考古

V1

有人说现在房子的质量不好了，原来的房子好。问一个解释/加强

参考：质量不好的老房子随年代已经坍塌

　　V2

某年代的老房子普遍比现在的房子质量好，因此推断出那时候的`建筑工更厉害。问：削弱

　　V3

说一个人发现建的早的房子比新造的房子坚固，所以以前的人的造房子工艺比较好。削弱题。狗主选项：选D，建造的早但是不坚固的都已经倒了

原文逻辑链：(确认和OG12上面114题十分相似)老房子质量好推出当时的建筑工更厉害

变体：选项是反着说的 就是 质量不好的都倒拉拆掉了之类的

　　OG中类似题

　　OG12-CR-114.

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

(A) The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

(B) Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

(C) The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

(D) The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

(E) The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.

The correct answer is D.